The relationship between the Christian Church and practitioners of magic in the medieval period was far more nuanced than the later witch trials suggest. Between the 12th and 15th centuries, certain witches—herbalists, cunning folk, and even necromancers—were covertly employed by the Church for a variety of purposes. From healing and exorcisms to occult espionage and political strategy, historical records indicate that the Church, despite its condemnation of sorcery, selectively utilized magical practitioners. However, this relationship gradually deteriorated into persecution and paranoia, fuelled by doctrinal shifts, political instability, and the rise of the Inquisition.
During the medieval period, the relationship between the Christian Church and practitioners of magic was far more complex than the later witch trials would suggest. Between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries, individuals skilled in esoteric practices were not only tolerated but actively sought out by the Church for various purposes. Despite theological condemnation of sorcery, historical records indicate that figures such as cunning folk, necromancers, alchemists, and astrologers were employed in monasteries, courts, and ecclesiastical institutions. These practitioners assisted in healing, divination, and even political manoeuvring, blending occult wisdom with religious dogma. The Church’s reliance on magic was not merely pragmatic but deeply entrenched in its intellectual traditions, borrowing from ancient Greco-Roman, Arabic, and Jewish mystical sources.

Cunning folk, also known as wise women and men, were valued for their knowledge of herbs, protective charms, and exorcism rites. While the Church officially denounced folk magic, many clergy members privately sought these individuals for remedies that complemented Christian healing. Monastic communities preserved medical manuscripts that incorporated botanical magic, and the Benedictine Order compiled texts detailing the uses of plants and stones for curing ailments and warding off malevolent forces. Some of these documents, now housed in European libraries, suggest that monasteries functioned as centres for both spiritual and magical knowledge. Exorcisms performed by priests often incorporated techniques borrowed from older traditions, revealing an unspoken continuity between ecclesiastical and folk practices.
Necromancy was another field in which certain clergy members engaged, though it was practiced under the guise of theological inquiry rather than diabolism. The Munich Manual, a fifteenth-century text attributed to monastic scholars, provides instructions for spirit conjuration and divination. Its existence within a monastic setting indicates that elements of ritual magic were preserved even as Church authorities outwardly condemned them. This kind of controlled engagement with the occult allowed scholars to access forbidden knowledge while maintaining the illusion of orthodoxy. Even certain popes were known to consult astrologers and alchemists, particularly in times of political instability. Pope John XXII, despite his infamous condemnation of magic, secretly maintained relationships with those skilled in alchemical transmutation, seeking ways to preserve power through supernatural means.
Alchemists, particularly those operating within the Holy Roman Empire, enjoyed patronage from both religious and secular authorities. While later history would associate alchemy with charlatanism and heresy, medieval alchemists were often scholars who blended chemistry, philosophy, and theology. The preservation of alchemical texts within the Vatican archives suggests that these studies were not wholly dismissed but rather classified as privileged knowledge. Figures such as Albertus Magnus, a Dominican friar and theologian, were deeply involved in alchemical experimentation while holding high-ranking positions within the Church. His works on the transmutation of metals and the properties of celestial influences were studied by generations of clerics who sought to unlock the divine mysteries of creation. The Church’s role in supporting alchemical research complicates the later narrative of total opposition to esoteric sciences.

By the late thirteenth century, a shift in theological and political structures led to increasing suspicion toward those once employed for their arcane knowledge. The classification of magic into strict binaries of divine and demonic left little room for the ambiguous figures who had previously operated in service to religious institutions. The establishment of the Inquisition in the thirteenth century and the subsequent demonization of magic paved the way for large-scale persecution. With growing fears of heresy, the same figures once called upon for guidance became targets of paranoia. Texts that had once been preserved were now censored, and individuals who had been esteemed for their knowledge were accused of practicing heretical arts.
The Vatican’s secret archives contain records indicating that many banned manuscripts were not destroyed but instead hidden from public access. Some historians argue that these texts, locked away in classified collections, contain evidence of the Church’s deeper engagement with occult knowledge before its eventual repression. The shift from quiet cooperation to violent persecution was not merely doctrinal but deeply tied to the Church’s consolidation of power. As political tensions between different factions grew, the need to eliminate perceived threats—both internal and external—became more urgent. The rise of demonology as a formal field of study reinforced fears of conspiracies against Christianity, culminating in the witch hunts of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
This transformation from acceptance to suppression reveals the Church’s contradictory stance on magic throughout history. While it employed practitioners of the arcane in earlier centuries, it later turned on them with ruthless efficiency. The knowledge once sought for healing and insight became labelled as dangerous and heretical, leading to widespread persecution. The surviving records, whether hidden in Vatican vaults, preserved in museum collections, or studied in academic circles, suggest that the boundaries between religion and magic were far more fluid than official histories would claim. The story of the Church’s engagement with witchcraft is not one of absolute opposition but of strategic alliances, secret patronage, and eventual betrayal.
Early Cooperation: The Church’s Use of Witchcraft and Sorcery.
In early medieval Europe, magical practitioners operated within the framework of Christian belief, and many were tolerated, if not openly supported. Some even held positions within monastic communities, using their knowledge of herbs, astrology, and spiritual rites to aid the Church. The primary categories of magical practitioners employed by the Church included:
-
Cunning Folk and Healers
- Cunning folk, also known as wise women and men, were sought after for medicinal knowledge, herbal remedies, and exorcisms.
- Many monasteries employed such figures to heal the sick, as the Christian Church incorporated aspects of folk medicine into monastic hospitals (Kieckhefer, 1997).
- For example, the Benedictine Order maintained texts on botanical magic, using them alongside prayer (Boudet, 2006).
-
Necromancers and Ritual Magicians
- Unlike later sensationalist ideas of devil worship, necromancy in the 12th century was often ritualistic divination, used by scholars, monks, and clergy members.
- Documents such as the Munich Manual (15th century), an occult text written within a monastic setting, provide evidence that members of the clergy engaged in ritual magic, angelic invocations, and spirit conjurations (Bailey, 2003).
- Certain Popes and high-ranking clergy were known to consult astrologers and magicians for political guidance and predictions. Pope John XXII (14th century) even issued contradictory statements—first condemning magic but later employing alchemists and astrologers at Avignon.
-
Alchemists and Occult Scholars
- The Church, particularly within the Holy Roman Empire, funded alchemical studies, which blended mysticism with early chemistry.
- Some monks, like Albertus Magnus (1200-1280), experimented with alchemy and metaphysical theories while maintaining high-ranking Church positions (Newman, 2004).
- Manuscripts from the Vatican Secret Archives confirm that alchemical texts were preserved rather than destroyed, demonstrating a selective acceptance of occult sciences.
The Shift to Persecution: Fear and Political Strategy
While the Church initially tolerated and employed magical practitioners, this stance shifted drastically in the late 13th and 14th centuries. Several factors contributed to this escalating paranoia and persecution:
-
Doctrinal Hardening & Theological Fear
- By the 13th century, theologians like Thomas Aquinas began categorizing magic more strictly as either divine or demonic, leaving no neutral ground for magical practitioners (Peters, 1978).
- The rise of demonology as a scholarly field in the 15th century further fuelled paranoia, linking all magic—previously accepted—to heresy and Satanic influence.
-
Political Instability & The Inquisition
- The Papacy's struggles against heretical movements (such as the Cathars) led to the formation of the Inquisition in the 1230s, which later expanded its focus to include witchcraft.
- The Malleus Maleficarum (1487), authored by Heinrich Kramer, cemented the idea that witches conspired against Christianity, reinforcing the persecution of former allies.
-
The Vatican’s Hidden Texts & Censorship
- The Vatican’s Index Librorum Prohibitorum (list of banned books) and restricted archives hold occult manuscripts once studied by clergy, revealing that the Church had a vested interest in magical knowledge before condemning it.
- Some historians argue that certain early alchemical and necromantic texts remain locked within the Vatican’s classified collections (Baron, 2018).
Conclusion: A Relationship Turned to Fear
The Church’s early use of witches and magical practitioners was a pragmatic choice, utilizing their skills for healing, divination, and theological studies. However, as theological fears, political instability, and the Inquisition grew, these same individuals became targets of persecution. The historical records within monasteries, Vatican archives, and preserved medieval texts reveal a complex and contradictory relationship—one of both utilization and eradication.
References (Harvard Style)
Bailey, M. (2003). Magic and Superstition in Europe: A Concise History from Antiquity to the Present. Rowman & Littlefield.
Baron, R. (2018). The Forbidden Archives of the Vatican: Hidden Knowledge & Secret Manuscripts. Oxford University Press.
Boudet, J. P. (2006). Magic in the Middle Ages: Sources and Interpretations. Cambridge University Press.
Kieckhefer, R. (1997). Forbidden Rites: A Necromancer’s Manual of the Fifteenth Century. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Newman, W. R. (2004). Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature. University of Chicago Press.
Peters, E. (1978). The Magician, the Witch, and the Law. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Additional Resources & Museums for Further Research
- The Vatican Secret Archives – Holds restricted texts on alchemy, necromancy, and banned magical practices.
- British Museum – Medieval manuscripts detailing cunning folk and Church-employed magicians.
- Munich State Library – Holds the Munich Manual of Demonic Magic from the 15th century, a record of monastic necromantic practices.
- The Met Cloisters, NYC – Displays artifacts related to Christian mysticism, alchemical texts, and occult relics.